In the recent Supreme Court decision on Hughes v. Northwestern University, retirement plan participants alleged that plan fiduciaries breached their duties. The fact that the case went as high as the Supreme Court meant it attracted much attention from the retirement industry.
To get a clearer picture on the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling, Treasury & Risk sister publication BenefitsPRO turned to attorney Emily Seymour Costin, a partner with Alston & Bird LLP, for help. Alston & Bird associate Ellie Studdard also contributed to the responses.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to Treasury & Risk, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited Treasury & Risk content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Critical Treasury & Risk information including in-depth analysis of treasury and finance best practices, case studies with corporate innovators, informative newsletters, educational webcasts and videos, and resources from industry leaders.
- Exclusive discounts on ALM and Treasury & Risk events.
- Access to other award-winning ALM websites including PropertyCasualty360.com and Law.com.
*May exclude premium content
Already have an account? Sign In
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
