At the end of 2001, the board of directors of Motorola Inc. did the almost unthinkable as far as executive pay is concerned: They cut it–or at least they voted not to come through with promised bonuses and stock awards for its top executive team. Thanks to the drubbing the company stock took when the telecommunications sector imploded, the directors no longer felt the compensation was merited. "It was painful [to do]," says B. Kenneth West, a Motorola board member and chairman of the National

Association of Corporate Directors, but "a properly constructed compensation program should reflect corporate performance on both a relative and absolute basis."

And after the carnage, Motorola was in fact a much smaller company. Its market capitalization had fallen from $44.4 billion at the end of 2000 to $33.9 billion in 2001; its revenues were down by 23%, and it had laid off thousands of workers. CEO Christopher Galvin can attest to that: He finished off the year making about $1.3 million–49% of what he took home the year before.

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Thought leadership on regulatory changes, economic trends, corporate success stories, and tactical solutions for treasurers, CFOs, risk managers, controllers, and other finance professionals
  • Informative weekly newsletter featuring news, analysis, real-world cas studies, and other critical content
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.