Hello? Is there anyone home at the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)? Admittedly, there is no shortage of examples of companies on the wrong side ...
By Pat Wechsler|March 01, 2007 at 07:00 PM
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Hello? Is there anyone home at the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)? Admittedly, there is no shortage of examples of companies on the wrong side of the law or compliance. But at a certain point when very smart finance people–including those at FASB–cannot agree about what a rule says or covers, one must start asking what is wrong with the rule and not what is wrong with those struggling to stay on its good side. Such is the case with FAS 133. While regulators may be correct that they are not changing rules–rather simply enforcing them in cases such as Fannie Mae and General Electric Co.–what is becoming ever more apparent is the inability of regulators to plainly and adequately explain them in the first place to companies who, for the most part, want to do the right thing. This produces exactly the kind of inefficiencies and excess costs that critics like to scream about–as treasury staffs devote themselves to worrying about whether changes in the value of tens, or hundreds, of derivatives perfectly offset changes in the underlying exposures.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to Treasury & Risk, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited Treasury & Risk content isn’t changing. Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
Critical Treasury & Risk information including in-depth analysis of treasury and finance best practices,
case studies with corporate innovators, informative newsletters, educational webcasts and videos, and resources from industry leaders.
Exclusive discounts on ALM and Treasury & Risk events.
Access to other award-winning ALM websites including PropertyCasualty360.com and Law.com.