Fearing proxy statement exposure, some companies are rejiggering compensation
By Anne Field|May 01, 2008 at 08:00 PM
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
These days, when Steven Hall sits down with his clients to hammer out the structure of their executive compensation plans, they take into consideration a new set of factors: How it will look in the cold light of day on their proxy statements. Thanks to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s new rules requiring more disclosure of top executives’ performance goals, including those of the CFO, a number of clients have started to think twice about just how shareholders might react to their bonus plans, according to Hall, president of Steven Hall & Partners, a New York executive compensation consulting firm. One client, who wanted to design a bonus that was solely based on time-vested options, decided to re-jigger the structure after realizing shareholders might demand more performance-based incentives. “When companies are making decisions, they’re thinking about what the disclosure will look like, and deciding their original design may not be the right thing to do after all,” says Hall. “I’ve seen clients go back to the drawing board as a result.”
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to Treasury & Risk, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited Treasury & Risk content isn’t changing. Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
Critical Treasury & Risk information including in-depth analysis of treasury and finance best practices,
case studies with corporate innovators, informative newsletters, educational webcasts and videos, and resources from industry leaders.
Exclusive discounts on ALM and Treasury & Risk events.
Access to other award-winning ALM websites including PropertyCasualty360.com and Law.com.