Protect the organization from financial risk. Reduce or eliminate surprises. Respond to new threats instantly. The demands for visibility extend in many directions. Fulfilling these expectations requires a more thoughtful approach than merely detailing the goals. The need for visibility isn't limited to a single category – it covers many areas, including:

Cash & Investments: Where are we exposed by entity or instrument type?
Counterparties: Is a bank or trading partner's credit deteriorating?
Country/Regional: What countries represent changing economic and business environments? What clients and customers are impacted by a particular disaster?
Currency: What is our current and future net exposure?
Capital and Liquidity: What will our working capital and liquidity needs be if commodity prices jump 35% and we face a rising rate environment?

Instead of approaching these and other financial risk issues with a coherent view to all of Treasury's responsibilities, many address them separately. The "separate approach" is often driven by an emergency, with the perception that it is the most expeditious method. Whether you take the "separate approach," a linear approach, or a broader, more coherent approach to Treasury's responsibilities, the challenges continue to emerge rapidly and continuously, much like the rodents in a Whack-A-Mole game. To confidently manage financial risk the following challenges must be addressed. Data Sits All Over the Place. Vital data sits in different systems in Treasury (risk system, TWS), in the firm (various ERPs, spreadsheets), and with outside parties (banks, rating agencies). Treasury is challenged with being a data consolidator—and data does need to be consolidated.

Instant Insights /

Treasury Visibility: Challenging the Assumptions

Related Stories

Recommended For You