An investor's challenge to the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS's) seizure of his cryptocurrency-exchange records has teed up a showdown with the government at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit over privacy rights and how the "third-party doctrine" applies in the digital age.

The Boston-based appeals court will consider a question-of-first-impression next month about whether the IRS violated a crypto trader's Fourth Amendment rights by obtaining his financial information from Coinbase without a warrant. The outcome could affect the government's ability to tax cryptocurrency profits.

Reed Smith partner Daniel H. Ahn said the case seeks to build on a landmark 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision, U.S. v. Carpenter. There, the justices said the third-party doctrine—which holds that people have no reasonable expectation of privacy in information they give to banks or other third parties—doesn't apply when the government accesses cell phone location data without a search warrant.

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Thought leadership on regulatory changes, economic trends, corporate success stories, and tactical solutions for treasurers, CFOs, risk managers, controllers, and other finance professionals
  • Informative weekly newsletter featuring news, analysis, real-world case studies, and other critical content
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Avalon Zoppo

Avalon Zoppo is an appellate courts reporter for The National Law Journal. Contact her at [email protected]. On Twitter: @AvalonZoppo.