In the beginning–that is, about a decade ago when purchasing cards were first being introduced–all p-card programs were created with the same goal in mind: Cut the absurdly high cost of processing purchases. Back then, companies were spending more, in many cases, to process the buying of little things than they were spending for the goods and services themselves. This fiscal madness had to be cured quickly, and p-cards offered the best available medicine.

Cookie-cutter programs proliferated, and in a competitive marketplace, issuing banks and card associations jockeyed vigorously for position by touting a variety of bells and whistles. At the end of the day, the differences were superficial, and best practice was essentially defined by the speed and efficiency with which a program could be implemented.

In recent years, that definition of best practice has changed significantly and differs widely from company to company and from industry to industry. To be sure, p-cards remain something of a commodity, subject to card association rules. But thanks to demands for customization from more savvy treasuries, that commodity is no longer a plug and play solution, but rather a carefully integrated tool in corporate procurement strategies.

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to Treasury & Risk, part of your ALM digital membership.

  • Critical Treasury & Risk information including in-depth analysis of treasury and finance best practices, case studies with corporate innovators, informative newsletters, educational webcasts and videos, and resources from industry leaders.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and Treasury & Risk events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including PropertyCasualty360.com and Law.com.
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.