Wasn't Sarbanes-Oxley supposed to cut down on financial restatements? Well, according to the Government Accounting Office, things have rarely been so bad. Between July 2002--when ...
By Robert Rosenberg|September 01, 2006 at 08:00 PM
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Wasn’t Sarbanes-Oxley supposed to cut down on financial restatements? Well, according to the Government Accounting Office, things have rarely been so bad. Between July 2002–when SarbOx was signed into law–and September 2005, the number of public companies announcing restatements because of financial reporting fraud or accounting errors soared to 6.8% of the companies listed on the NYSE, NASDAQ and the AMEX, from 3.7%. Compounding the problem, the GAO found that some 21% of companies that announced the intention to restate appear not to have filed the necessary disclosure documents required when companies plan to issue material information outside the normal reporting time. This indicates that the Securities and Exchange Commission may need to take corrective action or clarify guidance regarding disclosure filings.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to Treasury & Risk, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited Treasury & Risk content isn’t changing. Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
Critical Treasury & Risk information including in-depth analysis of treasury and finance best practices,
case studies with corporate innovators, informative newsletters, educational webcasts and videos, and resources from industry leaders.
Exclusive discounts on ALM and Treasury & Risk events.
Access to other award-winning ALM websites including PropertyCasualty360.com and Law.com.