Executive compensation will be a hot topic during the upcoming proxy season, which will see a second round of say-on-pay votes. Last year, only about 45 companies failed to win majority approval for their pay packages for executives, even though proxy advisory firms had recommended "no" votes for about 300 companies. But there is no room for complacency because this year proxy advisory firm ISS set the bar higher for the advisory votes on pay, suggesting that approval levels below 70% should trigger a closer look at a company's compensation.

Companies that fail to achieve that 70% level may want to rethink their compensation plans or defend them, says Don Keller, a partner at PwC's Center for Board Governance.

Martin Dunn, a partner at O'Melveny & Myers in Washington, notes that when investors are unhappy about a company's executive pay, "quite often it's not what needed to be changed, it's what needs to be better explained."

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Thought leadership on regulatory changes, economic trends, corporate success stories, and tactical solutions for treasurers, CFOs, risk managers, controllers, and other finance professionals
  • Informative weekly newsletter featuring news, analysis, real-world cas studies, and other critical content
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Susan Kelly

Susan Kelly is a business journalist who has written for Treasury & Risk, FierceCFO, Global Finance, Financial Week, Bridge News and The Bond Buyer.