Mutual-fund managers who lack experience or resources tend to beswayed by a home state advantage, according to a new study fromIndiana University's Kelley School of Business.

While it's common for portfolios to show a preference for nearbycompanies, it hasn't been clear whether bias or a greater amount ofinformation drives the predisposition toward investing in familiarcompanies, such as those headquartered in the manager's home state.A forthcoming paper in the Review of Financial Studies,“No Place Like Home: Familiarity in Mutual Fund Manager PortfolioChoice,” is the first to document and quantify this bias amongprofessional investors. The studyby three Kelley School professors examined 42,109 quarterly fundobservations for more than 2,000 funds.

Fund managers overweighted stocks from their home state by 12%compared with stocks from other states, according to the paper,investing an estimated $31 billion per year based on familiarity.The bias increased among fund managers who had less experience,fewer resources or had spent more time in their home state.

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to Treasury & Risk, part of your ALM digital membership.

  • Critical Treasury & Risk information including in-depth analysis of treasury and finance best practices, case studies with corporate innovators, informative newsletters, educational webcasts and videos, and resources from industry leaders.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and Treasury & Risk events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including and

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.