Global banking, a model promoted for more than 30 years byfinancial conglomerates cobbled together through cross-bordermergers, is colliding with the post-crisis reality of stricternational regulation.

Daniel K. Tarullo, the Federal Reserve governor responsible forbank supervision, announced plans last week to impose the samecapital and liquidity requirements on the U.S. operations offoreign lenders as on domestic companies. The U.K. and Switzerlandalso have proposed banking and capital rules designed to protecttheir national interests.

Regulators want to curtail risks exposed after global banks suchas New York-based Citigroup Inc., Edinburgh-based Royal Bank ofScotland Group Plc and Zurich-based UBS AG took bailouts in thebiggest financial crisis since the Great Depression. Forcinglenders to dedicate capital and liquidity to multiple localsubsidiaries, rather than a single parent, may undermine thebusiness logic of a multinational structure.

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to Treasury & Risk, part of your ALM digital membership.

  • Critical Treasury & Risk information including in-depth analysis of treasury and finance best practices, case studies with corporate innovators, informative newsletters, educational webcasts and videos, and resources from industry leaders.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and Treasury & Risk events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including and

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.