Global banking, a model promoted for more than 30 years byfinancial conglomerates cobbled together through cross-bordermergers, is colliding with the post-crisis reality of stricternational regulation.

Daniel K. Tarullo, the Federal Reserve governor responsible forbank supervision, announced plans last week to impose the samecapital and liquidity requirements on the U.S. operations offoreign lenders as on domestic companies. The U.K. and Switzerlandalso have proposed banking and capital rules designed to protecttheir national interests.

Regulators want to curtail risks exposed after global banks suchas New York-based Citigroup Inc., Edinburgh-based Royal Bank ofScotland Group Plc and Zurich-based UBS AG took bailouts in thebiggest financial crisis since the Great Depression. Forcinglenders to dedicate capital and liquidity to multiple localsubsidiaries, rather than a single parent, may undermine thebusiness logic of a multinational structure.

Continue Reading for Free

Register and gain access to:

  • Thought leadership on regulatory changes, economic trends, corporate success stories, and tactical solutions for treasurers, CFOs, risk managers, controllers, and other finance professionals
  • Informative weekly newsletter featuring news, analysis, real-world cas studies, and other critical content
  • Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
  • Critical coverage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.