It's one thing to build solid internal controls, but quite another to have a system in place to monitor those controls on a regular basis. While many companies do the former, not enough are good at the latter. That's the core take-away behind the latest release from COSO, the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The recently released exposure draft, Guidance on Monitoring Internal Control Systems, was developed in cooperation with a team of partners at Grant Thornton LLP.
“Companies need more insight into how to become much more efficient and cost effective in maintaining internal controls,” says COSO chairman Larry Rittenberg, adding that the draft was developed after COSO members observed that some public companies monitor their internal controls over financial reporting just once a year, in order to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. “Companies should monitor their controls every day through ordinary operations, to make sure those controls [are] operating effectively,” Rittenberg explains. The proposed guidance provides practical guidance and concrete examples of using the monitoring component of the COSO internal control framework to develop effective and efficient internal controls. “Once you establish good internal controls you ought to think of how to maintain them,” Rittenberg adds.
As the report states, central to effective monitoring is a system of procedures that evaluates key controls over specific risks to the organization. The proposed guidance illustrates effective monitoring with examples taken from real companies–including an international insurer, a beverage maker and distributor and a small software company. The report contains a monitoring model that walks users through the process of prioritizing risks, identifying controls, identifying information and implementing monitoring practices. Among the examples of effective monitoring practices is a beverage manufacturer and distributor that has built monitoring procedures for the owners of certain controls, who perform self-assessments on a monthly, quarterly and annual basis and then report the results in a tool on the company's network. Supervisory reviews are then carried out by managers of the control owners.
Continue Reading for Free
Register and gain access to:
- Thought leadership on regulatory changes, economic trends, corporate success stories, and tactical solutions for treasurers, CFOs, risk managers, controllers, and other finance professionals
- Informative weekly newsletter featuring news, analysis, real-world case studies, and other critical content
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.